In this case, our client was rear-ended in a collision the defendants tried to downplay as minor. However, we established that the impact was moderate and forceful enough to cause frame damage to the vehicles involved—making clear that the injuries sustained were not only plausible, but significant.
Liability was not at issue due to the nature of the crash. The defense instead focused on disputing the extent of our client’s injuries. Adding to the challenge, the defendants and their insurance carrier initially concealed the full extent of available coverage, falsely representing that only $250,000 in insurance was accessible.
Through rigorous and persistent discovery, we uncovered the existence of an umbrella policy—exposing an additional layer of coverage that the defense had failed to disclose. Our client ultimately required lumbar spine surgery, which was successful in addressing their chronic pain and limitations.
As trial approached and negotiations intensified, the defense recognized the strength of our case. We secured a $3.2 million settlement—far beyond what the defense initially claimed was reasonable. This result is a testament to our commitment to uncovering the truth and pursuing full justice for our clients.