AB 56: A Lifeline for Victims – California’s Expanded Compensation Law

In a landmark move to support crime victims, California has passed Assembly Bill 56 (AB 56), significantly expanding the state’s victim compensation program. At SHK Law, we’re committed to helping our clients understand and benefit from these crucial changes. Let’s explore how AB 56 could impact you or your loved ones.

Understanding AB 56: Enhanced Victim Compensation

AB 56 represents a major step forward in California’s commitment to supporting crime victims. This new law broadens the eligibility criteria and increases the scope of compensation available to those affected by criminal acts.

Key Changes Introduced by AB 56

  1. Expanded Eligibility: More victims now qualify for compensation, including those suffering from emotional and psychological injuries.
  2. Increased Financial Support: The law raises the maximum compensation amounts for various categories of expenses.
  3. Extended Time Limits: Victims now have more time to file claims, recognizing that the impact of crime can take time to manifest.
  4. Broader Coverage: The law now includes compensation for a wider range of expenses related to victimization.

How AB 56 Benefits Crime Victims in California

1. Comprehensive Support for Emotional Trauma

AB 56 acknowledges that the impact of crime extends beyond physical injuries. Victims can now receive compensation for mental health treatment and counseling services, addressing the often-overlooked emotional toll of criminal acts.

2. Financial Relief for a Wider Range of Expenses

The expanded compensation covers more than just medical bills. Victims can now seek reimbursement for:

  • Lost wages due to trauma-related inability to work
  • Relocation costs for safety reasons
  • Home security improvements
  • Crime scene cleanup

3. Increased Maximum Compensation Amounts

AB 56 raises the cap on various compensation categories, ensuring that victims receive more substantial financial support to aid in their recovery and rebuilding process.

4. Extended Filing Deadlines

Recognizing that trauma can delay a victim’s ability to seek help, AB 56 extends the time limits for filing compensation claims, ensuring more victims can access the support they need.

Why This Matters: Bridging Gaps in Victim Support

The enhancements brought by AB 56 address long-standing gaps in California’s victim support system. By providing more comprehensive aid, the law aims to:

  • Reduce the financial burden on crime victims and their families
  • Improve access to necessary mental health services
  • Enhance overall recovery and reintegration for victims

How SHK Law Can Help

At SHK Law, our experienced legal team of personal injury attorneys is committed to ensuring our clients receive all the support they’re entitled to under California law.

Take Action: Seek the Compensation You Deserve

If the aftermath of a crime in California continues to weigh on you and your family, remember that there is additional support available. AB 56’s expanded victim compensation program recognizes the ripple effects of these tragedies, offering financial assistance not only to direct victims but also to their loved ones who may be struggling with unforeseen expenses or the emotional toll of the experience. This support can be crucial in covering medical bills, therapy, lost wages, and other essential needs, allowing you to focus on healing and rebuilding. Don’t let the complexities of the legal system deter you from accessing the resources you need and deserve.

Contact SHK Law today for a free consultation.

The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice. Instead, all information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not constitute the most up-to-date legal or other information. It may also be inaccurate, incomplete, or inapplicable to the person reading it. This website also contains links to other third-party websites; such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser. The content on this webpage/website is provided “as is;” no representations are made that the content is error-free.

Readers of this website/webpage should contact their own attorney to obtain advice with respect to any legal matter. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or refrain from acting on the basis of information on this site. Instead, they should seek legal advice from counsel in their relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between the reader, user, or browser and the law firm SHK Law, the lawyers at SHK Law, or the authors or contributors of this website.

California Supreme Court Upholds Prop 22: Implications for Rideshare Drivers and Personal Injury Cases

On July 25, the California Supreme Court upheld Proposition 22, allowing companies like Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash to continue classifying their drivers as independent contractors rather than employees. This ruling in Hector Castellanos v. State of California was a significant victory for rideshare companies, maintaining their current business model. However, it also has important implications for personal injury cases involving rideshare drivers and passengers.

Key Points of the Ruling and Its Impact:

  1. Proposition 22 Upheld: The “Protect App-Based Drivers and Services Act” remains in effect, classifying app-based drivers as independent contractors.
  2. Legislative Challenges: The court noted a potential conflict between Prop 22’s requirement for a 7/8th legislative majority to make changes and the Legislature’s plenary power. This may lead to future legal battles if the Legislature attempts to pass conflicting provisions.
  3. Impact on Drivers: Rideshare drivers will continue to be classified as independent contractors, without access to traditional employee benefits such as overtime pay, sick leave, and workers’ compensation.
  4. Labor Group Reactions: Union leaders and labor-friendly lawmakers expressed disappointment but remain committed to securing better protections and conditions for gig workers.

Senate Labor Committee Chair Lola Smallwood-Cuevas stated, “While this decision is frustrating, it must also be motivating. I’m more determined than ever to ensure that all workers have the basic protections of workers compensation, paid sick leave, family leave, and disability insurance and the right to form a union.”

This ruling solidifies the independent contractor status of rideshare drivers in California, maintaining the current operational model of companies like Uber and Lyft for the foreseeable future. It also has significant implications for how personal injury cases involving rideshare drivers and passengers may be handled.

At SHK Law, we are a personal injury law firm that specializes in Uber, Lyft, and rideshare accident cases. We stay informed about new California legislation that could potentially impact our cases and affect our clients’ rights.

Impact on Personal Injury Cases

The upholding of Proposition 22 has several important implications for personal injury cases involving rideshare drivers and passengers:

  1. Lack of Workers’ Compensation: As independent contractors, drivers cannot claim workers’ compensation for injuries sustained while working. This may lead to more personal injury lawsuits against rideshare companies or other parties involved in accidents.
  2. Complex Insurance Coverage: Proposition 22 maintains the current insurance structure for rideshare companies, which can be complex. Coverage often depends on whether the driver was actively engaged in a ride at the time of the accident, potentially complicating liability claims.
  3. Liability Issues: The independent contractor status may affect how courts view the relationship between drivers and rideshare companies, potentially impacting liability determinations in accident cases.
  4. Potential for Future Changes: Given the ongoing legal challenges and legislative efforts, the landscape for personal injury cases involving rideshare drivers may continue to evolve.

Frequently Asked Questions

If you’ve been injured in a rideshare accident, you may have questions about your legal options. Here are some common concerns:

Q: What should I do immediately after a rideshare accident?

A: Seek medical attention, report the accident to the police and the rideshare company, gather evidence if possible, and contact an experienced attorney.

Q: Can I sue Uber or Lyft directly?

A: It depends on the circumstances. SHK Law can help determine the best course of action based on your specific case, considering the complex legal landscape surrounding rideshare companies.

Q: How are my rights as a passenger affected in a rideshare accident?

A: Passenger rights in rideshare accidents can be complex due to the unique nature of these services. Factors such as insurance coverage and liability can vary depending on the specific circumstances. SHK Law understands these complexities and can ensure your rights are protected.

Q: What types of compensation can I recover?

A: You may be entitled to economic damages (medical bills, lost wages) and non-economic damages (pain and suffering). SHK Law fights for maximum compensation across all categories, taking into account the unique aspects of rideshare accident cases.

How SHK Law Can Assist Your Rideshare Accident

At SHK Law, our thorough approach to rideshare accidents has produced case results securing millions of dollars in compensation for our clients. Our strategy combines swift action to preserve crucial evidence with expert collaboration, particularly with top accident reconstruction specialists.

We pride ourselves on building comprehensive cases, maintaining an unwavering commitment to uncovering the truth, and preparing strategically for litigation. Our understanding of the implications of recent legal developments allows us to navigate the complex legal landscape of rideshare accident cases effectively.

Our multifaceted approach ensures we’re always trial-ready and one step ahead in fighting for our clients’ rights and compensation. Our track record speaks for itself:

  • 50+ Combined Years of Experience
  • 99% Success Rate
  • Over $350 Million Secured for Our Clients
  • No Upfront Costs: Free Consultation, Contingency-based Fees

Want to Know if You Have a Case?

Get a free case evaluation today. Our experienced attorneys will fight to hold negligent rideshare companies and drivers accountable. Don’t let time slip away – strict legal deadlines apply to rideshare accident claims.

The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice. Instead, all information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not constitute the most up-to-date legal or other information. It may also be inaccurate, incomplete, or inapplicable to the person reading it. This website also contains links to other third-party websites; such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser. The content on this webpage/website is provided “as is;” no representations are made that the content is error-free.

Readers of this website/webpage should contact their own attorney to obtain advice with respect to any legal matter. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or refrain from acting on the basis of information on this site. Instead, they should seek legal advice from counsel in their relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between the reader, user, or browser and the law firm SHK Law, the lawyers at SHK Law, or the authors or contributors of this website.

$50M Lawsuit Reveals Titan Submersible Victims Knew Their Fate

The devastating implosion of the Titan submersible, which claimed five lives, has taken a dramatic turn as the family of victim Paul-Henri Nargeolet files a lawsuit exceeding $50 million against OceanGate, the vessel’s operator. This legal action brings to light the harrowing final moments of the crew and raises critical questions about liability and accountability in deep-sea exploration and maritime accidents.

The Tragic Final Moments

According to the lawsuit filed in King County, Washington, the submersible’s final dive was a nightmare scenario:

  • The Titan “dropped weights” just 90 minutes into its dive, indicating a desperate attempt to abort the mission.
  • Experts believe the crew likely heard the carbon fiber hull crackling under immense pressure, signaling the impending catastrophe.
  • The victims may have experienced profound “mental anguish,” fully aware of their impending fate before the vessel’s ultimate implosion.

“Common sense dictates that the crew were well aware they were going to die, long before dying,” the lawsuit states, highlighting the terror experienced by the victims in their final moments.

Legal Experts Weigh In

Adam J. Savin, co-founder and managing partner at SHK Law, a firm known for its expertise in maritime accidents, provides insight into the case:

“The Titan submersible tragedy presents a uniquely complex legal challenge,” Savin explains. “We’re dealing with experimental technology, international waters, and multiple jurisdictions. This case will likely set precedents for how we approach safety and liability in deep-sea exploration moving forward.”

OceanGate’s Alleged Negligence

The lawsuit doesn’t pull punches in its criticism of OceanGate and its CEO, Stockton Rush. It describes Rush as “an eccentric and self-styled ‘innovator'” who allegedly prioritized publicity over safety. The legal document accuses OceanGate of “persistent carelessness, recklessness, and negligence” in the design and operation of the Titan.

“What we’re seeing here is a potential pattern of disregard for established safety protocols,” Savin observes. “If these allegations are proven true, it could fundamentally change how we regulate and oversee experimental vessels in the future.”

Implications for the Industry

As the legal battle unfolds, the case raises critical questions about accountability in maritime disasters and the future of private deep-sea exploration. The upcoming U.S. Coast Guard investigation and public hearings in September are expected to shed more light on the tragedy and potentially influence the outcome of the lawsuit.

Savin emphasizes the importance of thorough investigation and expert legal representation in cases like these: “In tragedies like the Titan submersible incident, it’s crucial to uncover every detail and hold negligent parties accountable. This case could serve as a catalyst for change in how we approach safety in deep-sea exploration.”

Boating or Watercraft Accident FAQ:

While the Titan submersible case is unique, it highlights the complexities involved in maritime accident cases. For those involved in boating or watercraft accidents, here are answers to some frequently asked questions:

Q: What should I do immediately after a boating or watercraft accident?

A: Start by ensuring everyone’s safety and getting medical help if necessary. Report the accident to the local authorities and collect important information, such as contact and insurance details, from everyone involved. If possible, take photos of the scene. It’s essential to consult with an attorney before discussing the incident to ensure your legal rights are protected.

Q: How long do I have to file a claim after a boating or watercraft accident?

A: It’s crucial to consult an attorney right away, as deadlines can vary depending on the specifics of your case.

Q: What types of compensation can I seek for a boating or watercraft accident injury?

A: Medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, property damage, and potentially punitive damages.

Q: Who can be held liable in a boating or watercraft accident?

A: Operators, owners, rental companies, manufacturers, and other passengers in some cases.

Q: How is fault determined in a boating or watercraft accident?

A: Fault is determined through a thorough investigation of several factors, including operator negligence, violations of maritime laws, equipment malfunctions, and environmental conditions at the time of the accident. Each of these elements is carefully analyzed to establish responsibility.

Q: Do I need a specialized attorney for my boating or watercraft accident case?

A: Yes, this area of law is complex and demands specialized legal expertise. At SHK Law, we specialize in boating and watercraft accident litigation, offering comprehensive legal guidance to help clients achieve optimal outcomes.

The Titan submersible tragedy serves as a chilling reminder of the inherent risks in maritime activities. It highlights the critical need for expert legal guidance to protect victim’s rights and interests.

At SHK Law, we make your fight our own. With millions won for our clients, we combine tireless dedication, expert collaboration, and an unshakable commitment to justice to achieve the best possible results. Our trial-ready approach ensures we’re always one step ahead. By preparing to go to trial from day one, we negotiate from a position of strength, often leading to much higher settlements for our clients. Our case results speak for themselves:

  • 50+ Combined Years of Experience
  • 99% Success Rate
  • Over $350 Million Secured for Our Clients
  • No Upfront Costs: Free Consultation, Contingency-based Fees

Want to Know if You Have a Case?

Get a free case evaluation today. Our seasoned attorneys are committed to holding negligent parties accountable in boating and watercraft accidents. With strict legal deadlines in play, time is of the essence—don’t delay. Your path to justice begins with a single step. Let SHK Law be your trusted advocate in securing the accountability and compensation you rightfully deserve.

The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice. Instead, all information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not constitute the most up-to-date legal or other information. It may also be inaccurate, incomplete, or inapplicable to the person reading it. This website also contains links to other third-party websites; such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser. The content on this webpage/website is provided “as is;” no representations are made that the content is error-free.

Readers of this website/webpage should contact their own attorney to obtain advice with respect to any legal matter. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or refrain from acting on the basis of information on this site. Instead, they should seek legal advice from counsel in their relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between the reader, user, or browser and the law firm SHK Law, the lawyers at SHK Law, or the authors or contributors of this website.

Garbage Truck Collision in Santa Clarita Leaves One Dead, Another Injured

A devastating crash involving a garbage truck and another vehicle in Santa Clarita’s Canyon Country neighborhood has left one person dead and another hospitalized. The incident occurred on Friday, August 9, 2024, around 8:00 a.m. in the 17800 block of Soledad Canyon Road, north of the Santa Clarita River.

According to the Los Angeles County Fire Department, emergency responders arrived at the scene to find one person fatally injured. Alberto Hernandez, 21, of Santa Clarita, died of blunt force trauma when the car he was driving collided with a trash truck. Another individual involved in the collision was transported to a nearby hospital, though their current condition remains unknown.

The circumstances surrounding the crash are still under investigation. Authorities have not yet determined if factors such as alcohol, drugs, or speeding played a role in the accident. They are urging anyone with information about the incident to come forward and assist with the ongoing investigation.

This tragic event serves as a sobering reminder of the potential dangers on our roads, particularly when large commercial vehicles are involved. As the community grapples with this loss, questions arise about road safety and the measures in place to prevent such accidents.

Common Questions After a Commercial Trucking Accident

In the wake of such a devastating incident, many people may find themselves wondering about the steps to take if they or a loved one are involved in a commercial trucking accident. Here are some common questions and answers that may help:

Q1: How can a personal injury attorney assist me after a commercial trucking accident?

A1: A personal injury attorney specializing in commercial trucking accidents can guide you throughout the complex legal process. They will:

  • Conduct a thorough investigation: Trucking accidents often involve multiple parties and intricate liability issues. Your attorney will thoroughly investigate the accident, gather crucial evidence, and identify all responsible parties.
  • Protect your rights and handle all legal aspects: They’ll ensure you understand your legal rights, assist you with the intricate claims process, and negotiate with insurance companies and defense attorneys on your behalf.
  • Build a strong case for maximum compensation: They’ll work with experts to meticulously calculate the full extent of your damages, including medical expenses (past and future), lost wages, pain and suffering, and any other losses you’ve incurred.
  • Represent you in court if necessary: While many cases are resolved through settlements – if a fair agreement cannot be reached, your attorney will be fully prepared to take your case to trial and fight for your rights in court.

Q2: What qualities should I prioritize when selecting a personal injury attorney for my commercial trucking accident case?

A2: When choosing an attorney, consider the following key factors:

  • Experience in commercial trucking accidents: These cases often involve complex regulations and liability issues, so expertise in this specific area is essential.
  • Proven track record of success: Look for an attorney with a history of achieving favorable outcomes for their clients in similar cases.
  • Excellent communication skills: Your attorney should keep you informed about your case’s progress and be readily available to answer your questions.
  • Contingency fee arrangement: This means you only pay attorney fees if they win your case, making legal representation accessible regardless of your financial situation.

Q3: What types of compensation can I potentially recover after a commercial trucking accident?

A3: Depending on the specifics of your case, you may be entitled to compensation for:

Economic Damages:

  • Medical Costs: Covering past, present, and future medical bills, rehabilitation, therapy, medications, and any other necessary healthcare expenses.
  • Lost Income: Reimbursement for wages lost due to the accident, as well as compensation for any diminished earning capacity in the future.
  • Property Damage: The cost to repair or replace your vehicle or any other personal property damaged in the accident.

Non-Economic Damages:

  • Pain and Suffering: Compensation for the physical pain, emotional distress, and mental anguish caused by the accident and your injuries.
  • Loss of Consortium: If the accident impacted your relationship with your spouse, you may be able to seek damages for the loss of companionship, affection, and intimacy.
  • Punitive Damages: In cases of gross negligence or intentional misconduct, the court may award punitive damages to punish the wrongdoer and deter similar behavior in the future.

Q4: How long do I have to file a claim after a commercial trucking accident?

A4: The timeframe for filing a claim (known as the statute of limitations) varies depending on the state where the accident occurred. It is crucial to consult with an attorney as soon as possible after the accident to ensure your claim is filed within the applicable deadline. Failing to file your claim on time may forfeit your right to compensation.

Q5: What should I do if the trucking company or their insurance provider offers me a settlement?

A5: It’s imperative to consult with a personal injury attorney before accepting any settlement offer. Initial offers from insurance companies are often significantly lower than the full value of your claim. An attorney can assess the offer, negotiate on your behalf, and help you secure the maximum compensation you deserve.

The SHK Law Unique Approach to Commercial Trucking Accident Cases

With a deep understanding of commercial trucking laws and regulations, SHK Law has a proven track record of success in securing substantial settlements and verdicts for clients:

  1. Millions Recovered: We’ve secured millions in damages for clients, proving our dedication to achieving justice.
  2. Aggressive Investigation Process: We understand that the truth often lies beneath the surface. That’s why our investigations go beyond the obvious, digging deeper to expose negligence, uncover hidden evidence, and build an undeniable case for your claim. We refuse to settle for anything less than the full picture.
  3. Trial-Ready from Day One: Our seasoned trial attorneys prepare every case as if it’s heading to court. This strategic approach gives us a powerful advantage in negotiations and the confidence to fight for you in trial if necessary.
  4. Dedication to the Truth: We relentlessly pursue the truth behind every accident, leaving no question unanswered. Our focus is on identifying any violations of trucking regulations or negligence that contributed to your injuries.
  5. Rapid Response: We understand that evidence can disappear quickly in commercial trucking accidents. That’s why we mobilize immediately to secure crucial evidence and eyewitness accounts.

A Track Record of Success

Our trial-ready approach ensures we are negotiating from a position of strength, which often leads to better outcomes and higher settlements for our clients. We fight tirelessly to pursue justice—our case results speak volumes:

  • Proven Results: Over half a century of combined legal experience.
  • Client-Focused: $350+ million secured in compensation for our clients.
  • Track Record of Success: A 99% success rate in achieving favorable outcomes.
  • No Risk, Just Results: We work on a contingency fee basis, and consultations are always free.

Want to Know if You Have a Case?

Our free case evaluation can provide clarity and peace of mind. Our experienced attorneys will assess your situation, explain your rights, and help you understand the best course of action.

The aftermath of a trucking accident can be overwhelming, but securing legal representation shouldn’t add to your burden. Your case demands urgent attention due to strict filing deadlines and the risk of losing critical evidence. Don’t jeopardize your chance at justice – act now.

The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice. Instead, all information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not constitute the most up-to-date legal or other information. It may also be inaccurate, incomplete, or inapplicable to the person reading it. This website also contains links to other third-party websites; such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser. The content on this webpage/website is provided “as is;” no representations are made that the content is error-free.

Readers of this website/webpage should contact their own attorney to obtain advice with respect to any legal matter. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or refrain from acting on the basis of information on this site. Instead, they should seek legal advice from counsel in their relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between the reader, user, or browser and the law firm SHK Law, the lawyers at SHK Law, or the authors or contributors of this website.

How AB 455 is Changing California’s Approach to Gun Violence

California has made a significant move in its ongoing effort to curb gun violence with the enactment of Assembly Bill 455. Signed into law by Governor Gavin Newsom, this legislation addresses firearm possession for individuals involved in mental health diversion programs, aiming to enhance public safety and reduce the risk of gun-related incidents.

AB 455, Effective July 1, 2024

AB 455 addresses a specific gap in California’s firearm laws by focusing on individuals in mental health diversion programs who may pose a danger to themselves or others. The law empowers courts to prohibit these individuals from purchasing or possessing firearms if they are deemed a danger. This restriction is in place for the duration of the diversion program or until the court restores the individual’s firearm rights.

Scope and Intent

It’s important to note that AB 455 is not a comprehensive reform of all firearm relinquishment laws in the state. The bill is more targeted in its approach, addressing the risks associated with this specific group rather than broadly overhauling California’s firearm regulations. While it aims to ensure that these individuals do not have access to firearms during their treatment, its scope is limited to this particular context.

Misconceptions About the Law

There has been some confusion about the scope and impact of AB 455. Unlike some reports that suggest the law introduces new standards for firearm relinquishment across all cases, AB 455’s provisions are specifically tailored to those in mental health diversion programs. It also does not impose a mandatory 24-hour firearm surrender for all newly prohibited individuals, nor does it expand the list of prohibited persons beyond those in these specific programs.

AB 455 and Its Potential Ripple Effects in Wrongful Death Cases

While AB 455 is fundamentally about enhancing gun safety measures for individuals engaged in mental health diversion programs, its influence could extend to wrongful death cases stemming from firearm violence. The bill’s clearer guidelines on restricting firearm access for this population may indirectly strengthen arguments of negligence in certain scenarios.

For example, if a wrongful death results from a firearm in the hands of someone undergoing mental health treatment, the victim’s family might contend that a failure to enforce the restrictions outlined in AB 455 contributed to the tragedy. It’s critical to understand, however, that the bill doesn’t create new legal definitions of negligence in these cases.

Legal and Safety Ramifications

Aside from its possible impact on wrongful death lawsuits, AB 455 is a clear sign of California’s strong commitment to gun safety, especially when it comes to mental health. We can anticipate the law influencing future court and law enforcement actions related to firearm possession, especially for those undergoing mental health treatment. Nonetheless, its primary impact remains focused on preventing firearm-related harm within this specific group – rather than fundamentally altering the legal framework for all gun-related cases.

At SHK Law, we recognize the devastating impact of wrongful death cases, especially those arising from gun violence. While AB 455 strives to improve public safety, seeking justice for the loss of a loved one demands experienced legal support. Our commitment to trial readiness translates into tangible results, including higher settlements and favorable verdicts for our clients. Our case results speak for themselves:

Proven Track Record

  • 50+ Combined Years of Experience
  • 99% Success Rate
  • Over $350 Million Secured for Our Clients
  • No Upfront Costs: Free Consultation, Contingency-based Fees

Want to Know if You Have a Case?

Get a free case evaluation today. Our experienced attorneys will fight relentlessly to ensure your loved one’s voice is heard and those responsible are held accountable.

The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice. Instead, all information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not constitute the most up-to-date legal or other information. It may also be inaccurate, incomplete, or inapplicable to the person reading it. This website also contains links to other third-party websites; such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser. The content on this webpage/website is provided “as is;” no representations are made that the content is error-free.

Readers of this website/webpage should contact their own attorney to obtain advice with respect to any legal matter. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or refrain from acting on the basis of information on this site. Instead, they should seek legal advice from counsel in their relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between the reader, user, or browser and the law firm SHK Law, the lawyers at SHK Law, or the authors or contributors of this website.