California has made a significant move in its ongoing effort to curb gun violence with the enactment of Assembly Bill 455. Signed into law by Governor Gavin Newsom, this legislation addresses firearm possession for individuals involved in mental health diversion programs, aiming to enhance public safety and reduce the risk of gun-related incidents.

AB 455, Effective July 1, 2024

AB 455 addresses a specific gap in California’s firearm laws by focusing on individuals in mental health diversion programs who may pose a danger to themselves or others. The law empowers courts to prohibit these individuals from purchasing or possessing firearms if they are deemed a danger. This restriction is in place for the duration of the diversion program or until the court restores the individual’s firearm rights.

Scope and Intent

It’s important to note that AB 455 is not a comprehensive reform of all firearm relinquishment laws in the state. The bill is more targeted in its approach, addressing the risks associated with this specific group rather than broadly overhauling California’s firearm regulations. While it aims to ensure that these individuals do not have access to firearms during their treatment, its scope is limited to this particular context.

Misconceptions About the Law

There has been some confusion about the scope and impact of AB 455. Unlike some reports that suggest the law introduces new standards for firearm relinquishment across all cases, AB 455’s provisions are specifically tailored to those in mental health diversion programs. It also does not impose a mandatory 24-hour firearm surrender for all newly prohibited individuals, nor does it expand the list of prohibited persons beyond those in these specific programs.

AB 455 and Its Potential Ripple Effects in Wrongful Death Cases

While AB 455 is fundamentally about enhancing gun safety measures for individuals engaged in mental health diversion programs, its influence could extend to wrongful death cases stemming from firearm violence. The bill’s clearer guidelines on restricting firearm access for this population may indirectly strengthen arguments of negligence in certain scenarios.

For example, if a wrongful death results from a firearm in the hands of someone undergoing mental health treatment, the victim’s family might contend that a failure to enforce the restrictions outlined in AB 455 contributed to the tragedy. It’s critical to understand, however, that the bill doesn’t create new legal definitions of negligence in these cases.

Legal and Safety Ramifications

Aside from its possible impact on wrongful death lawsuits, AB 455 is a clear sign of California’s strong commitment to gun safety, especially when it comes to mental health. We can anticipate the law influencing future court and law enforcement actions related to firearm possession, especially for those undergoing mental health treatment. Nonetheless, its primary impact remains focused on preventing firearm-related harm within this specific group – rather than fundamentally altering the legal framework for all gun-related cases.

At SHK Law, we recognize the devastating impact of wrongful death cases, especially those arising from gun violence. While AB 455 strives to improve public safety, seeking justice for the loss of a loved one demands experienced legal support. Our commitment to trial readiness translates into tangible results, including higher settlements and favorable verdicts for our clients. Our case results speak for themselves:

Proven Track Record

• 50+ Combined Years of Experience
• 99% Success Rate
• Over $350 Million Secured for Our Clients
• No Upfront Costs: Free Consultation, Contingency-based Fees

Want to Know if You Have a Case?

Get a free case evaluation today. Our experienced attorneys will fight relentlessly to ensure your loved one’s voice is heard and those responsible are held accountable.